[Libreoffice-qa] BugZilla enhancemnet suggestion

[Cor Nouws]

Hi Florian, *,

Florian Reisinger wrote (23-06-14 05:52)

> Oh, I thought you meant integrating directly in bugzilla... 

Yes, that is what I wrote too.
(Big advantage of proper quoting & replying in mail ;) )

> You know we as QA do have a lot of things on the list to improve stuff... 

I know, since I am part of the battle against a considerable workload
caused by duplicate issues and 'help-requests' (thanks to BSA..).
Hence my suggestion: in a reported bug, add a button that starts a query
based on the summary of that issue, not necessarily the component, and
that opens the result in a new tab.
Makes finding duplicates much faster.

> But some does require coding... Like the bugzilla things, a GUI for
> bisect and the other items of Joel's list ( ;) ). We are full of
> fancy ideas, for now that is not a big deal to get ten....

Great that the team knows what is needed to improve the work, make it
more effective.
Personally I would avoid the terms "fancy ideas". Having worked some 6
hours yesterday in BugZilla, one can only conclude that there is a
serious need for tools that make it easier to get the work done. To much
just isn't.

Then if there is no possibility/time/skills in QA to do that: we are not
alone in TDF, are we? And there are donations to get improvements in the
tooling done. So..

Cheers,
Cor

-- 
Cor Nouws
GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28  A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6
- vrijwilliger http://nl.libreoffice.org
- volunteer http://www.libreoffice.org
- The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/attachments/20140623/cb366a4a/attachment.sig>