[Libreoffice-qa] Question of the use of 'Fresh' rather than 'Beta' and support for XP
Jay Philips
philipz85 at hotmail.com
Mon May 5 03:13:04 PDT 2014
Hi All,
I was curious why the word "Fresh" is used rather than the more widely
used word "Beta" for the latest development release branch. This was a
confusing thing to me as well until I read "Fresh, targeted to early
adopters and technology enthusiasts, and Stable targeted to enterprise
deployments and conservative users” at
<http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2014/04/29/the-document-foundation-announces-libreoffice-4-1-6/
>. Chromium,Firefox and the like use theword "Beta" for development
branches and users testing and reviewing LibO would understand it as
such, so that negative compatibility reviews don't show up similar to
the review that brought me into testing LibO <
http://netrunner-mag.com/libreoffice-vs-microsoft-office-part-deux/ >.
With the recent talk about 4.3 not working on windows XP, i was
wondering how long XP will be supported by LibO as chrome, firefox, and
opera have stated that they will continue to support XP as long as it is
popular among their users. As a recent ex-windows XP user, i believe
many users will stick with XP for another half decade or more and i
think that supporting these users with a modern open source office suite
as an alternative to the last version of ms office that will run on XP
and Vista (office 2010) would be a great advantage to bringing in more
users to LibO, especially as LibO continues to improve in compatibility
and features. Microsoft will continue to support office 2007 for another
3 years and office 2010 for another 7 <
http://www.allyncs.com/docs/lifecyclesupport.html >.
--
Jay Philips
More information about the Libreoffice-qa
mailing list