[Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

[Florian Reisinger]

Hi,

For 180d (1/2y)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&f1=days_elapsed&list_id=481820&o1=greaterthan&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&v1=180 
[162 bugs]
And for 365d (1y)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&f1=days_elapsed&list_id=481820&o1=greaterthan&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&v1=365 
[2 bugs]

Am 18.10.2014 um 08:58 schrieb Tommy:
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 05:22:56 +0200, Joel Madero 
> <jmadero.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Okay - if you want I'll run this with my normal needinfo cleanup on the
>> first of the month. How's that sound?
>>
>> Best,
>> Joel
>
> sounds nice. I suggest to wait a few days more for the release of LibO 
> 4.3.3 (Week 44 , Oct 27, 2014 - Nov 2, 2014) in order to have the 
> latest Fresh release available for testing.
>
> I'm just curious to know what would be the actual numbers of 
> UNCONFIRMED and NEW bugs with last comment older than 6 months and 1 
> year.
>
> can you obtain those numbers to have a simulation of what would be the 
> corrispondent mail traffic that we are going to generate? can you do 
> that with your Bugzilla admin "powers" ?
>
> once we have those numbers we may decide wheter to run the "please 
> retest ping campaign" against 6 months old bugs or just 1 year old bugs.
>
> as said before, the first real test has to be done on UNCONFIRMED 
> bugs, maybe we can already ping 6 months old bugs which should not be 
> that many (exact numbers needed though)
>
> also give a look at my mockup automated message and tell me if look 
> good in english:
>
> ............................................................................... 
>
> Dear users, this bug report has shown no new comments in the last 6 
> months.
>
> or
>
> Dear users, this bug report has shown no new comments in the last 12 
> months.
>
> Newer LibO releases with hundred of bugifixes and new features have 
> been releases meanwhile, so please retest with latest LibO release 
> (4.3.3.2) and give feedback of the actual status of the bug.
>
> If the bug is not reproducible anymore, please post a comment and set 
> status to RESOLVED WORKSFORME.
> If the bug is still present leave status UNCHANGED and post a new 
> comment telling the LibO version and O/S where you retested.
>
> Regardless of what you find in newer versions, the VERSION fields 
> should stay at the _first_ version that showed the buggy behaviour, so 
> please do not change that value to a later version.
>
> ............................................................................... 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org
> Change settings: 
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems? 
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

-- 
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger