[Libreoffice-qa] Libreoffice-qa Digest, Vol 46, Issue 21

Tue Apr 28 05:00:15 PDT 2015

issues here?

  97 conversion seems to slip something in.
  (injects weirdness, ie xml ebooks gets blank pages.)

 I think it's int 10; handing line feed is wonky in other format
conversions.

E-BOOKS :  SF+Fantasy novels  comics by Kevin Williams
https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/packrat2  -novels (cartoons, sf+fan)
http://packrat.comicgenesis.com -comics
http://www.youtube.com/area163 -film
------
  Always remember kiddies, that Mickysoft *IS* the great satan. Monsanto is
just evil.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:00 PM, <
libreoffice-qa-request at lists.freedesktop.org> wrote:

> Send Libreoffice-qa mailing list submissions to
>         libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         libreoffice-qa-request at lists.freedesktop.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         libreoffice-qa-owner at lists.freedesktop.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Libreoffice-qa digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Question regarding bug workflow (Philippe Jung)
>    2. Re: Question regarding bug workflow (V Stuart Foote)
>    3. Re: Question regarding bug workflow (V Stuart Foote)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 19:21:39 +0200
> From: Philippe Jung <phil.jung at free.fr>
> To: libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Libreoffice-qa] Question regarding bug workflow
> Message-ID: <553D1EA3.9040900 at free.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hi,
>
> I have questions regarding bug/fix workflow. From my understanding,
> developers and QA wiki pages provide only partial answers.
>
> To make it simple, I have a bug. Its status is NEW. I produced a patch
> to fix the problem.
>
> ----
>
> I updated it by setting "Assigned to:" with my email and changing status
> to ASSIGNED. (And I guess I should have done it as soon as working on
> the bug).
>
> It is not clear that I have to make these two changes, one page dealing
> of easyhack (Development/Easy_Hacks) mentions changing "Assigned to"
> email but not changing status
>
> ----
>
> I push the patch to gerrit.
> Who changes the status to resolved and when?
> A scheme on wiki QA/BSA/BugReport_Details suggests that ASSIGNED becomes
> RESOLVED when "Development is finished". Does development finished
> includes code review, merged into master... ?
>
> ----
>
> Maybe not (only) QA related:
> Who commits from Gerrit into master ?
> In which release ?
> How QA team knows the bug has to be verified ?
>
> ----
>
> Regards
> Philippe
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:02:42 -0700 (MST)
> From: V Stuart Foote <VStuart.Foote at utsa.edu>
> To: libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question regarding bug workflow
> Message-ID: <1430146962234-4147380.post at n3.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> @Philippe,
>
> Your patch for  tdf#34555
> <https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34555>   "Make
> cropping
> handles for images (as in Draw/Impress) available for all LibreOffice
> applications"  is sitting in the Code review queue in Gerrit.
>
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/15541/
>
> Depending on its merit and successful code review by other developers, it
> may or may not be merged. If there are issues, whomever reviews it will
> comment in gerrit and may ask your for changes, or make suggestions as to
> what needs to be corrected.  It is up to you to track its status, and
> collaborate with the other devs on completing its merge.
>
> When the final patch is merged, the commit should be automatically
> reflected
> in the TDF bugzilla.  Then, after some review by other users all seems
> acceptable--you as the assigned developer should close the issue as
> resolved
> fixed.
>
> Good luck, and thank you for taking the time to tackle the issue.
>
> Stuart
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Question-regarding-bug-workflow-tp4147378p4147380.html
> Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:14:47 -0700 (MST)
> From: V Stuart Foote <VStuart.Foote at utsa.edu>
> To: libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question regarding bug workflow
> Message-ID: <1430147687988-4147381.post at n3.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Sorry, forgot to mention that if/when it is merged from Gerrit, you should
> add a a note in the BZ issue whiteboard, e.g.
> target:5.0.0  ( ref
>
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced#target
> )
>
> If you feel the patch should be ported back to a prior branch-- you will
> need to check out that branch from git and   adjust/apply your patch to
> that
> code base--and if you have successful build and correct function locally
> thenpush it to Gerrit for code review.
>
> When "backporting" should expect a more rigorous review for complex patches
> being pushed to prior released branches, that is when not submitting
> against
> master.
>
> Stuart
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Question-regarding-bug-workflow-tp4147378p4147381.html
> Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Libreoffice-qa Digest, Vol 46, Issue 21
> **********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/attachments/20150428/827e5161/attachment.html>