[Libreoffice-qa] Proposal for BH sessions organization

Sophie gautier.sophie at gmail.com
Mon Feb 29 17:47:54 UTC 2016

Hey Cor,
Le 29/02/2016 18:37, Cor Nouws a écrit :
> Hey Sophie,
> Sophie wrote on 29-02-16 18:27:
>> But bug hunting sessions are dedicated to new features and testing them
>> thoroughly before the releases, so what you propose is something
> Sure. It's no one else but us, though, that determine the purpose of BHS.
> So if we learn that a certain approach is not appealing any more (or not
> at the moment), why not change? As BHS' currently do not work for new
> release testing, it would be a pity not to use them for another hard
> needed subject.

Because we need those versions with new features to be more tested. That
doesn't prevent to do other testing, and that's why we need to
reorganize the BHS in a more attracting way and make them successful.
>> .... so what you propose is something
>> different, but could be implemented under another name like "code
>> squeezing sessions" 
> Another event could possibly put extra pressure on people's agenda. Not
> sure if that will be met with applause :)

That could be also addressed by different populations, those who wants
their version with less bugs and don't care about new features could be
the best participants while others would be new feature lovers.
> But.. it's my feeling and my opinion. If there is strong evidence of
> support for something else: fine for me :)

No problem, you know that we sometime have different opinions but it's
important to discuss them :) Thanks a lot for your feedback.


Sophie Gautier sophie.gautier at documentfoundation.org
GSM: +33683901545
IRC: sophi
Co-founder - Release coordinator
The Document Foundation

More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list