[Libreoffice-qa] Propose new keywords want-valgrind and have-valgrind

[David Tardon]

Hi,

On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 07:40:20AM -0700, julien2412 wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> In the same way, we got keywords "want-backtrace" and "have-backtrace" in
> Bugzilla, it could be useful to have "want-valgrind" and "have-valgrind".
> The goal is to re
> Moreover, we already have a link how to do it (even if for the moment, it's
> only for Linux)
> :https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugReport/Debug_Information#GNU.2FLinux:_How_to_get_a_Valgrind_log.
> 
> Any thoughts?

I think this is both too specific and too generic. On one side, valgrind
is only one of available memory debuggers: there is also ASAN (granted,
it requires a specific setup) or DrMemory on Windows. On the other side,
memory checker is only one of the valgrind tools (albeit the default
one). Maybe "want-memtrace" or "want-memcheck"? (I prefer the latter.)

D.