Importance flow chart
Ilmari Lauhakangas
ilmari.lauhakangas at libreoffice.org
Wed Jul 3 06:19:33 UTC 2024
On 3.7.2024 8.10, Stéphane Guillou wrote:
> Hi all
>
> It is sometimes raised that the flow chart we use as a recommendation
> for setting a Bugzilla ticket's importance (priority + severity) is
> inadequate in some cases. For a recent example, see
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161217
>
> Julien has commented on the topic on the Discussion page for that flow
> chart:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File_talk:Prioritizing_Bugs_Flowchart.jpg
>
> If you have some thoughts on the topic, or think it should be updated /
> augmented for any other reason, please comment on the wiki as well.
>
> Note that we already have some notes at the bottom of the chart, that
> explain that the chart is indicative and other parameters should be
> taken into account when setting the Importance. One thing that is not
> included but is commonly done is that the Priority level can be raised
> if the author of the commit that caused a regression is not active
> anymore, and therefore unlikely to look into it.
Copying here my comment added to BZ and the wiki:
"It's critical because severity is about the *effect* as opposed to
priority. A very rare bug can still have critical effects and remain at
lower priority due to its rarity."
So there is no need to do anything unless there is a desire to get rid
of the severity field completely.
Ilmari
More information about the Libreoffice-qa
mailing list