[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 90006] spellcheck to indicate a spelling as rare thus usage to be confirmed
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Sun Jul 23 05:04:07 UTC 2017
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90006
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |vstuart.foote at utsa.edu
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> ---
(In reply to Nick Levinson from comment #5)
>
> I think this can be done by adding a Boolean (true/false) field to every
> entry in every dictionary. The default entry would be false (as in 'false
> spelling'). But if a user could supply a file of rare-but-correct spellings
> or could edit a single entry, the status of true would mean 'true spelling
> albeit rare'.
>
> That leaves how the UI should inform users of likely-misapplied rare
> spellings.
>
> An extension would seem appropriate for the UI once the rarities are
> recognizable but probably not to the necessary hooks in LibreOffice,
> especially the additional field. Since the hooks would need something in LO
> itself, I'm restoring this report's status.
Way out of scope for the way our bundled dictionaries/thesaurus are produced
and maintained. Have a look at the Hunspell, and Lightproof projects and
restrictions on how word lists can be altered.
The "User-defined dictionaries" model Heiko described provides framework for
customized (individually or by some collaborative work group) lexical aids
without imposing a non-maintainable data structure of alternates.
Presently the LanguageTool.org project provided extension supports rules based
checking--one can write their own for their custom dictionary needs.
If the Grammarly project ever spins up an extension for AOO/LO that would be a
treat for using its "context-optimized word choice" but again these are
extensions and not something applicable to LibreOffice core, and hooks
extension authors need for GUI interface are provided in the SDK.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Libreoffice-ux-advise
mailing list