[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 156099] Rename "rotation object" to "solid of revolution"

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156099

V Stuart Foote <vsfoote at libreoffice.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rb.henschel at t-online.de,
                   |                            |sophi at libreoffice.org,
                   |                            |vsfoote at libreoffice.org

--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <vsfoote at libreoffice.org> ---
Actually ODF 1.3 sec. 10.5 provides our 3D Shape handling. And 10.5.7 [1]
defines "a three-dimensional rotation shape based on the given polygon" as
implemented in source with lathe3d.hxx

All the strings used for 3D shapes are consistently defined [2] as Objects.

So, there is no error in translation. And IMHO in this context "rotation
object" is more appropriate than the more convoluted "solid of revolution"
which while lexically correct adds nothing to the UI or the UX.

Term change would also trigger l10n translator thrash.

IMHO => WF

=-ref-=
[1]
https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/os/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part3-schema.html#element-dr3d_rotate
[2]
https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/include/svx/strings.hrc?a=true&r=d0a9d04d&h=139#139

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.