[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PUSHED, partially] Re: [PATCH] cppcheck "Common realloc mistake"

[Caolán McNamara]

On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 09:02 +0100, Gert Faller wrote:
> I was just wondering if freeing some bytes was worth while.
> A patch for this...

re: realloc_patch_3.patch
Yeah, it's probably a bit expensive to realloc in order to drop a tiny
amount of bytes, but its an unlikely code path anyway so patch applied
and warning silenced :-). Pushed.

re: realloc_patch_4.patch
Tracing the logic, yes this look good. a failure on realloc will trundle
down past everything else and end up with a return false which is what
we want here. Pushed.

C.