[Libreoffice] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Use a generic unxgcc.mk
kyoshida at novell.com
Wed Nov 17 09:01:17 PST 2010
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 17:18 +0100, René Kjellerup wrote:
> Why the oracle copyright notice in the new file too?
> Shouldn't they have a TDF notice instead ?
Yes, for new files, we should use the following header notice.
* Version: MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+
* The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version
* 1.1 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
* Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" basis,
* WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License
* for the specific language governing rights and limitations under the
* The Initial Developer of the Original Code is
* [ insert your name / company etc. here eg. Jim Bob <jim at bob.org> ]
* Portions created by the Initial Developer are Copyright (C) 2010 the
* Initial Developer. All Rights Reserved.
* Contributor(s): Jim Bob <jim at bob.org>
* Ted <ted at bear.com>
* Alternatively, the contents of this file may be used under the terms of
* either the GNU General Public License Version 3 or later (the "GPLv3+"), or
* the GNU Lesser General Public License Version 3 or later (the "LGPLv3+"),
* in which case the provisions of the GPLv3+ or the LGPLv3+ are applicable
* instead of those above.
with (obviously) the name of the developer(s) being you.
This header boilerplate is also available as COPYING.NEWFILES at the
root of the build repository.
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
<kyoshida at novell.com>
More information about the LibreOffice