[Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir?
michael.meeks at novell.com
Fri Oct 29 13:41:26 PDT 2010
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 19:34 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Jani Monoses píše v Pá 29. 10. 2010 v 17:49 +0300:
> > This page describes building in the topmost dir
> > http://www.documentfoundation.org/develop/
> > whereas the wiki-page example changes to rawbuild before.
> > Which one is recommended? I have been building from topmost dir so
> > far.
> rawbuild/ is recommended for development, because you have the git
> tracking there - you are easily able to generate patches that way.
But - of course, I use the mechanism that is recommended on the
web-site, and that is tested by most of our beginners, and is known to
work well ;-) [ ie. build/libreoffice-* ] - and yes it is deadly
The screwed up situation of having these two places to build, two
different conflicting makefiles with different rules etc. needs to be
cleared up ASAP - post the branch / freeze over the weekend, this needs
to be one of the first things we fix I think.
Hopefully the situation will not persist indefinitaely, since it works
for me without problems, I'd personally recommend the web-site page
approach :-) manifestly it has only four simple steps: autogen,
download, make, bin/ooinstall ...
michael.meeks at novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
More information about the LibreOffice