[Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces
bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com
Tue Apr 19 14:17:49 PDT 2011
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:55:59 +0100
Caolán McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> wrote:
> namespace libreoffice = com::sun::star;, or something of that nature,
> in some header probably isn't the worst idea in the world. Though it
> does generate a lot of churn to go around changing anything, and the
> other language bindings, e.g. java and so on, wouldn't be affected,
> which i guess has the potential for some extra confusion.
IMHO doing a "gradual migration" is not a good idea here. Such
things should be done in one deep cut, because:
- having two names for the same thing will just add to newcomer
confusion, esp. if he ends up in a piece of code that mixes both
happily. This will one only have benefits once it is completed and
will even hurt in the meantime.
- historical evidence (tools string vs. sal string) shows how well
"gradual transitions" work when not tightly enforced.
- we will not tightly enforce this one as it is not providing essential
benefits compared to other work.
- while it is true that this can be done by EasyHackers, I really dont
thing there is any lack of EasyHacks. There are other tasks like:
(or migration to the new build system) that also only really benefit
the project when fully completed. It is better to have one such
EasyHacks finished (and being rewarded by the benefit) than having
five such EasyHacks finished 20% (or even 50%) and having no benefit
for the project whatsoever.
Just my 2 euro cents,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the LibreOffice