[Libreoffice] Git tags: why not "3.3.4-rc2" instead of "3.3.4.2"
Michael Meeks
michael.meeks at novell.com
Thu Aug 18 12:40:13 PDT 2011
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 19:37 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> On 18/08/2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele Barabucci<gioele at svario.it> wrote:
> >> Is this behaviour a leftover of the SVN workflow? Could it be changed?
Why is it worth changing ? :-) certainly anything can be changed; but
why bother ? There is no problem I can see with releasing 3.5.0.3, the
numbers increase in a sensible fashion, and can be trivially compared by
machine and eye.
It looks like yet-another bikeshed to me :-) I'd be more concerned that
git tag -l on the 'core' repo has dozens of tags for the same version:
artwork_libreoffice-3.4.0.2 base_libreoffice-3.4.0.2 etc. personally ;-)
suggestions for cleaning that up much appreciated.
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks at novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list