[Libreoffice] Git tags: why not "3.3.4-rc2" instead of ""

Michael Meeks michael.meeks at novell.com
Thu Aug 18 12:40:13 PDT 2011

On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 19:37 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> On 18/08/2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele Barabucci<gioele at svario.it>  wrote:
> >> Is this behaviour a leftover of the SVN workflow? Could it be changed?

	Why is it worth changing ? :-) certainly anything can be changed; but
why bother ? There is no problem I can see with releasing, the
numbers increase in a sensible fashion, and can be trivially compared by
machine and eye.

	It looks like yet-another bikeshed to me :-) I'd be more concerned that
git tag -l on the 'core' repo has dozens of tags for the same version:
artwork_libreoffice- base_libreoffice- etc. personally ;-)
suggestions for cleaning that up much appreciated.



 michael.meeks at novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list