[Libreoffice] Naming builds. Please???

Pedro pedlino at gmail.com
Tue Dec 6 14:59:42 PST 2011

Hi Lionel, Petr, *

> Your format needs manual conversion to do that. But it has other
> advantages, which you describe. So <shrug> I have no strong opinion on
> this point.

While you (devs) think about this would it be possible to implement
the Pretty Print date on the About box to match the date included in
the filename as suggested by Petr Mladek?

This would be immediately useful for QA and l10n people testing with
daily/nightly builds.

Also, as suggested by Petr

>     + human readable string for official builds for normal users:
>      => I would add one more line, .e.g. 3.5.0-beta1
>         it will be used only in the official builds generated from
>         release tarballs or release tags

Can this be added for the upcoming Beta1 or at least for Beta2 and all
future Betas and RCs?


View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Naming-builds-Please-tp3556898p3565927.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20111206/b9e39671/attachment.htm>

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list