[Libreoffice] [PATCH] possible null-dereferencing found by cppcheck

[Caolán McNamara]

On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 07:45 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> >> Or am I missing something... 
> > Yes, we have a miserable trap of fall-through:
> 
> No, I did see the fall-through. But if pDlg is NULL (a bit earlier), we
>  don't enter the block that contains the switch with the fall-through,
>  where the other (hopefully only other possible) case does set pArgs

Those abstract dialogs should never fail in practice, nevertheless I've
added an early return for that case.

C.