[Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ...
Cor Nouws
oolst at nouenoff.nl
Thu Jul 7 11:34:47 PDT 2011
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (26-06-11 01:16)
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Cor Nouws<oolst at nouenoff.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Therefore I argue that it would not be fair
>> to decide on 7 weeks from the deadline, that it is shortened by 3 or 4
>> weeks.
>
> Sure, but delaying the Release Date by 3 or 4 weeks will not be fair
> to downstream either
Indeed. Therefore, if we decide that we need some more QA time between
"Hard feature freezed & branched libreoffice-3-5 " (and I expect that we
will come to that conclusion), then that time must be picked in front,
and in time.
> The calendar was worked out by picking a Release date that would work
> for downstream - RedHat, Canonical, Suse,... - and then working our
> way backward to a 'freeze date'. the consequence of a major downstream
> not being able to pick-up a release of ours is much more important, in
> my opinion, than a given feature being pushed to the next release.
Fully agree.
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list