[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

[Caolán McNamara]

On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:46 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> On 01/29/2011 03:04 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:13 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> >> What about using GCC atomic builtins like in the attached patch?
> >
> > Excellent, the pthread fallback always niggled me.
> 
> Sorry for not thinking about this earlier, can this be cherry-picked 
> into the 3.3 branch?

This doesn't affect a lot of people in practice, only the Linux
non-x86/x86_64 people IIRC, +1 from me if you want to stick it into 3-3.

C.