[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

[Jani Monoses]

On 03/09/2011 06:01 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:46 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
>> On 01/29/2011 03:04 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:13 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
>>>> What about using GCC atomic builtins like in the attached patch?
>>>
>>> Excellent, the pthread fallback always niggled me.
>>
>> Sorry for not thinking about this earlier, can this be cherry-picked
>> into the 3.3 branch?
>
> This doesn't affect a lot of people in practice, only the Linux
> non-x86/x86_64 people IIRC, +1 from me if you want to stick it into 3-3.
>

Great. Who can do the actual sticking into 3.3 (I can't) ?
This was the master commit: 788072cefdce8cb61d46549a7aede4c754d9fae3
thanks

Jani