[Libreoffice] Reviewing rules

Kohei Yoshida kyoshida at novell.com
Fri May 20 09:20:49 PDT 2011

On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 10:45 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've seen some patches that were reviewed, but not pushed into the -3-4
> branch (!!!), so just to remind you:
> - the first reviewer pushes to libreoffice-3-4 (commits/cherry-picks
>   with -s to get the Signed-off-by: message automatically)
> - the third reviewer cherry-picks the commit(s) from libreoffice-3-4 to
>   libreoffice-3-4-0, again with -s

Also, I'd like to have some consistency in the [REVIEW] tag.  We have so

[REVIEWED - 1 more needed]

and I'm having hard time coming up with a good filter rule in Evolution
to include all of these.  Evolution doesn't support regexp search which
also adds to the difficulty.

How are others coping with this?


Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
<kyoshida at novell.com>

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list