[Libreoffice] [PATCH] make STR_MERGE_NOTEMPTY more understandable

[Eike Rathke]

Hi,

On Wednesday, 2011-11-09 15:15:33 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:

> > Isn't "Should the contents of all cells be concatenated and moved into
> > the merged cell?" better ?
> 
> I like the following better:
> 
> Do you want to merge the contents of the selected cells into one cell?
> Clicking 'No' will only retain the content of the upper-left cell.

I agree with the wording of the question, but "will only retain" to me
sounds as if the content of other cells would be lost, which isn't the
case, it's just not displayed and hidden in the merged cells. We also
should avoid terms like upper-left, as in a right-to-left environment it
would be the top right cell instead.

  Eike

-- 
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20111110/03123ac3/attachment.pgp>