Installing our CLI DLLs on Windows XP SP3 with .NET 2.0 and 3.5 (but no newer) fails

Jonathan Aquilina eagles051387 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 01:25:31 PST 2012


Not trying to butt in here, but doesnt windows update usually ask you to
install the latest version of the .NET stuff anyway?

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Andras Timar <timar74 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tor,
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Tor Lillqvist <tml at iki.fi> wrote:
> > This is probably nothing new, but something I just recently became
> > aware of, using my build from the libreoffice-4-0 branch. I am not
> > sure if I have interpreted my testing correctly, please discuss.
> >
>
> You probably built with .NET 4.0 SDK. There is a CustomAction in
> installer that checks for the required .NET version, which is 2.0.0.0
> at the moment.
>
> http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/setup_native/source/win32/customactions/shellextensions/dotnetcheck.cxx#128
> Either we can bump this (REQUIRED_DOTNET_VERSION) to 4.0.0.0 or we
> should make sure that we use older .NET SDK. I'm happy with both
> options. Are there any users of this assembly at all? It is either
> perfect, or there are no users, because I have not seen any bug
> reports related to this feature.
>
> Best regards,
> Andras
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>



-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20121210/50305e9c/attachment.html>


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list