[PATCH] [core/vcl/source/window/splitwin.cxx:2047] ->[core/vcl/source/window/splitwin.cxx:2045]:(style) Found duplicate branches for if and else.
sbergman at redhat.com
Thu Feb 16 06:06:15 PST 2012
On 02/16/2012 12:18 PM, Matteo Casalin wrote:
>> I personally find 'if' more legible than ?: and definitely expressions like b = x==y || x==z;
>> I am not sure if WindowAlign will always have only these 4 members and possibly the author of
>> the original version wasn't either (thus final else).
>> Since I am a newbie here, I would vote for a simple 'if' or a 'switch'.
>> Let me know what is the decision and I will change the code accordingly or... feel free to
>> change the code and provide an alternative patch.
> +1 for switch/break approach!
> More legible and open to possible later modifications without
> requiring "code decodification" efforts. Hopefully the compiler is
> smart enough to generate efficient code for such simple actions.
Whatever somebody chooses to actually put in here is fine with me
anyway. (I only "woke up" when I saw the "... ? false : true"
construct, which is unnecessarily complex.)
More information about the LibreOffice