[Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ?

[Thorsten Behrens]

Michael Meeks wrote:
> 	So - I don't think that should be an issue, but Thorsten would know. In
> a nutshell though the approach is right - it is a madness to ship 2x
> versions of libraries when we could ship one - and having tons of stuff
> as .oxts when we ship it be default is just silly :-)
> 
+1

Let's turn all our in-tree c++ extensions into proper, optional
components.  Shipping those by default was the first step towards
this, desirable, end goal.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20120106/1cb0e6ab/attachment.pgp>