[Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ?
thb at documentfoundation.org
Fri Jan 6 08:29:18 PST 2012
Michael Meeks wrote:
> So - I don't think that should be an issue, but Thorsten would know. In
> a nutshell though the approach is right - it is a madness to ship 2x
> versions of libraries when we could ship one - and having tons of stuff
> as .oxts when we ship it be default is just silly :-)
Let's turn all our in-tree c++ extensions into proper, optional
components. Shipping those by default was the first step towards
this, desirable, end goal.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the LibreOffice