[PUSHED 3-5] fdo#47644 performance regression on largish .doc #2 ...

[Michael Meeks]

On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:24 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> I think it looks pretty good now anyway FWIW, I'd initially wanted to
> build up an incremental chain, but knew I wouldn't get (even the simple
> case) right in any reasonable length of time. Glad I didn't try given
> the "busted storages, but we happen to stick to the fairly ok bits when
> reading" case :-)

	:-) 

> I don't know of any specific other examples outside of the existing
> "special" ole2 cases we have in the regression tests. At least
> collecting those together as cppunit tests has had some some payoff.

	Yep - having the test harness there was a Godsend for writing the
backwards reading / directory traversal test :-)

	Pushed to -3-5 with your sign-off.

	Thanks,

		Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks at suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot