3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

[Petr Mladek]

bfo.bugmail at spamgourmet.com píše v Čt 24. 05. 2012 v 21:20 +0200:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Petr Mladek - pmladek at suse.cz wrote:
> >> Please consider. Always you can ask the friendly guys at Mozilla how
> >> to set this all up...
> > Thanks for tip.
> 
> What a discovery! Seems like complete how to:
> http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/Mozilla_Source_and_Symbol_Server
> Blog postings, bugs on b.m.o, other resources also worth of checking:
> http://crashopensource.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/starting-the-project-mozilla-source-and-symbol-server/
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385792
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408134
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419904
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424240
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428518
> http://web.archive.org/web/20071218162257/http://www.jorgon.freeserve.co.uk/Other/pdb.htm

Great catch. Now we need to find a volunteer who would work on this. I
have put it into bugzilla and added flags for the "EasyHacks" pages. 
See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50350


> It would be great if ESC could go the Mozilla's path of doing things
> in QA department.
> The knowledge base is on Mozilla's wiki. Software is... open sourced
> and available to download.
> You should get connected to make LO better. Definitely.

We are already using Litmus and are going to migrate to Moztrap. Though,
we are not familiar with the real processes that used in the Mozilla
project.

Do you have any experience with the Mozilla processes? Are you able to
compare it with the current LibreOffice processes that are described at 
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA ?

This is the area where we really need improvements. It would be great if
you could join us and discus particular changes on the libreoffice-qa
mailing list.

Best Regards,
Petr