Is the lcl_LocalFunction naming convention useful?
sbergman at redhat.com
Mon Oct 15 03:24:38 PDT 2012
On 10/09/2012 07:59 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Where did this lcl_ convention come from? The lcl_ prefix has no
> meaning to a compiler or linker.
One way this /did/ have influence on linking was the old mechanism to
select symbols for DLL export on Windows, where the available symbols
were matched against white/black-lists, and lcl_* was always
black-listed. Long gone (and I have no idea why people didn't simply
use "static" anyway).
More information about the LibreOffice