Is the lcl_LocalFunction naming convention useful?

[Eike Rathke]

Hi Stephan,

On Monday, 2012-10-15 12:24:38 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:

> symbols were matched against white/black-lists, and lcl_* was always
> black-listed.  Long gone (and I have no idea why people didn't
> simply use "static" anyway).

IIRC, by chance, not using static stems from times where there was
a sort of code coverage run to reorder object files within libraries for
better paging, there static functions interrupted the call chain.

  Eike

-- 
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
Support the FSFE, care about Free Software! https://fsfe.org/support/?erack
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20121022/57c5039f/attachment.pgp>