[PUSHED 3-6-3] Windows Java Accessibility fix ...
pmladek at suse.cz
Mon Oct 22 07:13:56 PDT 2012
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:06 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/22/2012 03:50 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 09:48 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> >>> Nominated the fdo#53474 as a most annoying for 3.6. It is a regression from
> >>> 3.5 and has been with us now for four build/QA reviews.
> >>> Not sure of the etiquette but are you willing to take assignment of the bug?
> >> Provisionally, on the condition that the patch really fixes the problem
> >> I guess that would not be a problem (except to actually round someone to
> >> review the patch, because nearly everyone is at the conference).
> > So - the patch looks rather sensible to me; I've back-ported it to -3-6
> > to avoid the win32 build issues it can't really hurt I think; it'd be
> > great to have a confirmation that it helps though :-)
> > I'd be happy to have that in -3-6-3 too if we can; anyone else want to
> > give a +1 to:
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-6&id=b3a49f990273c9fa6e2b90245c271a14b38280f0
> You have my +1, but I'm not sure the fix actually helps on Windows,
> where JNIEXPORT likely expands to the same as SAL_DLLPUBLIC_EXPORT
> (namely __declspec(dllexport)), anyway.
Let's give it a try. It should not harm => pushed into 3-6-3.
More information about the LibreOffice