[REVIEW-3-6-3 2/3] Windows Java Accessibility fix ...
sbergman at redhat.com
Mon Oct 22 07:06:37 PDT 2012
On 10/22/2012 03:50 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 09:48 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
>>> Nominated the fdo#53474 as a most annoying for 3.6. It is a regression from
>>> 3.5 and has been with us now for four build/QA reviews.
>>> Not sure of the etiquette but are you willing to take assignment of the bug?
>> Provisionally, on the condition that the patch really fixes the problem
>> I guess that would not be a problem (except to actually round someone to
>> review the patch, because nearly everyone is at the conference).
> So - the patch looks rather sensible to me; I've back-ported it to -3-6
> to avoid the win32 build issues it can't really hurt I think; it'd be
> great to have a confirmation that it helps though :-)
> I'd be happy to have that in -3-6-3 too if we can; anyone else want to
> give a +1 to:
You have my +1, but I'm not sure the fix actually helps on Windows,
where JNIEXPORT likely expands to the same as SAL_DLLPUBLIC_EXPORT
(namely __declspec(dllexport)), anyway.
More information about the LibreOffice