build difficulty

[Stephan Bergmann]

On 08/30/2013 09:16 AM, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> Sometimes my question is why on the earth one does not make something
> non-copyable by declaring and not defining private copy constructor and
> operator= and bothers with the complexity of boost for just this little
> thing.

...because boost::noncopyable has become the de-facto standard idiom for 
this, at least for pre-C++11 code that depends on Boost anyway. 
[citation missing]

Stephan