build difficulty

[Fridrich Strba]

On 30/08/13 11:11, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> ...because boost::noncopyable has become the de-facto standard idiom for
> this, at least for pre-C++11 code that depends on Boost anyway.
> [citation missing]

Sure, nice to have standard idiom that causes us to have to work-around
implementation bugs. Where two private declarations could be enough. But
then maybe I am too low-level for the modern C++ developers. I even know
how to manage my memory myself :)

F.