Question about intended behaviour in UpdateTags (sd, annotationmanager.cxx)

[Caolán McNamara]

On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 11:10 +0100, Matteo Casalin wrote:

> 827     if( bSynchron )
> 828     {
> 829         if( mnUpdateTagsEvent )
> 830             Application::RemoveUserEvent( mnUpdateTagsEvent );
> 831
> 832             UpdateTagsHdl(0);

> 
> I think that UpdateTagsHdl should be called unconditionally (and thus 
> back-indented), ... I already have a patch ready for this.

Yeah, I think that's the intent here, so sure, fix the indent and leave
it as unconditional.

C.