Save as formats explored
nthiebaud at gmail.com
Fri Nov 8 10:13:54 PST 2013
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:43 AM, jonathon <toki.kantoor at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 07:20 PM, Bryan Quigley wrote:
>> 1. Remove all of the "OpenOffice.org 1.0" file formats.
>> More importantly I don't see any use case for this file format anymore. Is anyone still exporting to it / or know anyone who is?
> Legacy documents: The organization might not use the specific file
> format anymore, but they do have them in their archives.
> That said, if there is a _maintained_ user installable extension that
> enables LibO to read/write/edit those file formats, then eliminating
> them from the standard lineup should be acceptable to all.
> Caveat: Once upon a time, one of the features was that support for
> legacy documents was built in. By migrating file format input/output to
> extensions, third parties might not accept that legacy file formats are
> still supported.
>> 2. Change one of these names to be consistent:
>> Either: OpenDocument Text (odt) or Flat ODF Text Document (fodt)
> Two different document types.
yes... but the issue is the inconsistent naming
OpenDocument for one and ODF for the other... when the only difference
is Flat or not-flat
More information about the LibreOffice