Please regenerate api.libreoffice.org from libreoffice-4-1 branch
sbergman at redhat.com
Wed Sep 4 23:41:08 PDT 2013
On 09/04/2013 11:56 PM, Andras Timar wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel at mamane.lu> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 02:00:28PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>>> On 08/03/2013 02:56 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>>>>> * API date issue (Lionel/Stephan)
>>>>> + patches pending on gerrit for -4-1
>>>>> AI: + review & get them in before Monday:
>>>> So, consensus appears to be to go with option 1 ("Break ABI/API in
>>>> 4.1.1") from
>>>> "More time-related API headache"? Did you happen to have any
>>>> further discussion about it during the ESC meeting?
>> So, we did that for LibreOffice 4.1, but api.libreoffice.org still
>> documents the old API. Who can regenerated api.libreoffice.org from
>> up-to-date libreoffice-4-1 (or master?) branch?
> I updated api.libreoffice.org from master.
(linked as "IDL Reference" from <http://api.libreoffice.org/>) gives 404.
And <http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/cpp/ref/index.html> (linked as "C++
Reference" from <http://api.libreoffice.org/>) still claims "LibreOffice
220.127.116.11.alpha0+ SDK C/C++ API Reference," so I'm not sure whether the
website files didn't get updated, or got updated from a stale master build.
Also, it occurs to me that we should give the SDK version number also on
the main <http://api.libreoffice.org/> page, to avoid confusion. I'll
look into the odk/ sources from which it is generated.
Finally, can you give a quick instructions how to update that site (what
permissions does one need to request where, etc.)? Would probably make
sense to have more people able to do that (and sure, I'd volunteer to be
one of them).
More information about the LibreOffice