FDO - New Milestone
bishop.robinson at gmail.com
Wed Nov 19 19:38:09 PST 2014
[adding QA list back to cc]
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:50 PM, julien2412 <serval2412 at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> Great news indeed.
> But is there a milestone for :
> - oldest bugs, there are more than 500 bugs older than 2011-06 (3 years
We've got 564 bugs in that range
Of those, 21 are UNCONFIRMED/NEEDINFO (mostly UNCONFIRMED). Older open
bugs that aren't yet triaged are definitely on the radar of QA.
> - bug marked as regression (didn't play with search options to know the
> number) ?
We've got several stats on regressions. We have some in the ESC
minutes each week, and we also keep track of stats in the QA minutes:
> I mean, why to focus only about unconfirmed ones even if they're important
> of course?
Oh, certainly -- there a number of different groups of bugs on which
we can focus :-)
The 'preBibisect' bugs are always a great group to QA to tackle.
Currently we have 17 bugs that need sleuthing to figure out where in
the [OOo - LO 3.5] range they first appeared, and the OSX bibisect
repo is perfect for that purpose:
Aside from prioritizing bugs and putting them on MAB lists, is there
anything specific QA can do to highlight specific bugs for the devs?
QA Engineer - The Document Foundation
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
qubit at libreoffice.org
More information about the LibreOffice