LibreOffice extensions to ODF: Improving documentation
mstahl at redhat.com
Thu Nov 27 11:15:21 PST 2014
On 27.11.2014 15:07, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Michael Stahl <mstahl at redhat.com> wrote:
>> sounds nice, except:
>>> ! ODF Version(s) Extended <!-- e.g. 1.2+ -->
>> this should generally be the latest ODF version that the LO release
>> supports, ... so what's the benefit of tracking this?
> I expect that there will be features in ODF 1.3 that were implemented
> as extensions to ODF 1.2 in LibreOffice. If a user of LO 6.5 saves a
> file in ODF 1.2 for backwards compatibility, I wanted to be clear
> about whether the file created would use this extension.
hmm if the user says "ODF 1.2" then no, if "ODF 1.2 extended" then yes,
but see below ...
>> and if you select to store your files in a specific,
>> non-extended version in Tools->Options you don't (or at least shouldn't)
>> get any extensions...
> I totally agree :-) My reasoning was that once ODF 1.3 comes out, ODF
> 1.2 Extended might still be a user-selectable option. But perhaps that
> won't be the case?
well i don't think it's likely, we don't have "ODF 1.1 extended" now for
a counter-example; i don't think that it existed after OOo 3.0 added ODF
1.2... indeed my install of OOo 3.0.1 has only "ODF 1.0/1.1" and "ODF
1.2" as options.
>>> ! Validation Errors <!-- Any errors/warnings this feature will
>>> trigger in an ODF validator, or "none" -->
>> i'm not sure if this is so useful - you can tell the validator if you
>> want to check strictly against the schema or allow extensions:
>> -c: Check conformance (default for ODF 1.2 documents)
>> -e: Check extended conformance (ODF 1.2 documents only)
> That sounds good to me! In the past at least I tried validating
> generated documents against the "extended conforming" option of the
> OpenDoc Society's online validator
> (http://odf-validator.rhcloud.com/), and got several errors. Assuming
> that the documents are indeed "extended conforming," I wouldn't expect
> any errors.
there were some errors there in the past because extension elements and
attributes used standard ODF namespaces, which is not allowed.
hopefully those should be fixed now.
More information about the LibreOffice