Scripting: idesupport package is dead and can be dropped?
dtardon at redhat.com
Wed Oct 8 23:30:11 PDT 2014
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:04:45AM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
> I asked this question on IRC yesterday, but didn't get an answer, so
> re-asking it here.
> Am i right in my assumption that idesupport package is dead and can be
> The reason i am asking is while reviewing this Gerrit change  i was
> wondering that the base version was already broken, at least since this
> commit , 1.5 years ago but wasn't noticed because it was never
> migrated to gbuild or was already dead in dmake era.
If I read the original build.xml correctly, this was never part of a
regular build, but had to be built explicitly. I wonder if it actually
worked even before gbuildification. And how many people knew about it...
Since nobody has protested about it during the past 3 years, I think we
can safely assume it is dead.
Btw, it is the whole scripting/java/org dir that is dead, not just the
idesupport subdir of it.
More information about the LibreOffice