OS X build signature

[Jonathan Aquilina]

They dont need to relax the gatekeeper settings they go in and just hit
open, but I agree it can get a bit annoying, What would i need to do to try
and help figure out why this is happening?

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:20 AM, V Stuart Foote <VStuart.Foote at utsa.edu>
wrote:

> Jonathan Aquilina wrote
> > There is a way around that all one has to do to open libreoffice is go to
> > system preferences and go to securty and you can do one of two things
> >
> > 1) change gatekeeper settings
> > 2) open libreoffice. After that it doesnt prompt you again.
>
> Of course-- there are work arounds. But, why are the Apple signatures of
> our
> builds not passing OS X Gatekeeper muster and allowing a seamless
> installation.
>
> Why instead must users relax Gatekeeper to globally accept untrusted
> packages--not acceptable,  or preferably must perform a one-time by-pass to
> allow LibreOffice to install/configure to completion. It should not be
> needed if we have done our signature and Apple registration correctly.
>
> Additionally, we now need to explain the issue, and work around(s),  to OS
> X
> users in the release notes.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OS-X-build-signature-tp4138158p4138179.html
> Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>



-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20150130/a4ed7748/attachment.html>