Changing mindset of core LO developers to the status of master -- was test infrastructure ideas appreciated ...

[Tor Lillqvist]

> Let's have a branch called "lo-next", or "bleeding", or something like
> that. I don't have access to Mac, and don't build on Win. How hard is it
> to push all changes to "bleeding", and then either cherry-pick or bulk
> push all changes to master when they pass on all relevant test boxes.
>

I agree, except that I would call the "bleeding" branch "master", and call
the "master" branch "libreoffice-5-0". Oh, wait, that is what we already
have!

(Is the above humour, irony or sarcasm? Determining that is left as an
exercise to the reader.)

--tml
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20150611/8ac0b52a/attachment.html>