Performance issues with our internal memory allocator
markus.mohrhard at googlemail.com
Mon Sep 28 06:11:39 PDT 2015
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Noel Grandin <noelgrandin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2015-09-28 11:11 AM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
>> So it seems that the system allocator is actually even worse as can be
>> seen at
>> I'll leave it in for a bit as I want to see what happens if we increase
>> the memory for the vm but I fear that the
>> numbers show that the internal allocator is actually useful.
> Probably best would be to walk up the stack a little and see if you can
> get the code that calls the allocator to reduce the number of times it
> needs to do so.
> I always find that it way more useful (and more fun) than fiddling with
> custom allocators :-)
I'm not sure if I understand your comment. Can you please clarify what you
mean with that? Maybe my understanding of our memory allocators is bad but
I see not how this comment applies to the discussion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the LibreOffice