tdf#96482 (5.0.4 regression introduced in fix of tdf#94069) [was: minutes of ESC call ...]
michael.meeks at collabora.com
Mon Jan 25 09:28:53 PST 2016
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:49 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> So, some bisecting shows that its
> commit 87199d3829257420429057336283c55be6ae7481
> Author: Michael Meeks <michael.meeks at collabora.com>
> Date: Tue Nov 24 16:59:29 2015 +0000
> vcl: re-introduce idle handling.
> which fixed the problem on master/5-1. Its non-trivial to backport that
> though to 5-0. Not sure how that should look if applied to 5-0
Right; it's ~impossible to back-port without some seriously
heavy-lifting / re-qualification process - I'm amused/interested to hear
that it fixed something ;-) I'd not support it going into -5-0 really.
I'd suggest that it'd be better to work out what two (or more) events
are getting mis-ordered to cause the issue in the bug - and get stack
traces from those code-points in both 5.0 and 5.1 - and I'd be happy to
take a look; perhaps in-person at FOSDEM.
Thanks Caolan !
michael.meeks at collabora.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
More information about the LibreOffice