XFastParser - next steps ...
Michael Meeks
michael.meeks at collabora.com
Tue Jun 28 16:28:15 UTC 2016
Hi Mohammed,
Let me CC the dev list on the fag-end of this conversation; hopefully
it will get more interesting over time =)
On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 22:01 +0530, Mohammed Abdul Azeem wrote:
> I'm looking into the code paths which misuses defined namespaces
> without resolving them. I will make test cases to cover them.
Ah - right =)
> Sure we can do this, but it would only account for element's namespace
> and not attributes namespaces. Also some of the implementations of
> XDocumentHandler expects namespace declaration( looking for "xmlns" )
> and tries to resolve them, and I think this approach wouldn't cover
> all the namespace declaration.
Ah ! fair enough - then (I guess) we need to implement a new
XFastNamespaceHandler which we can register with a setNamespaceHandler()
call on XFastParser - and which can be NULL for all the interesting
cases where we need to be truly fast =)
Then (I guess) we could pass namespace prefixed names through for the
unknown attributes so eg. "office:foo" - and still have the information
we need to properly resolve them.
Failing that (I guess) - we could as you've done push xmlns: statements
through in attributes - it would best match the css::xml::Attribute
approach that expat_wrap used in the past - and would simplify things
for us.
In this case - I'd want to see:
a) comprehensive test cases, with assertions for all
code-paths.
b) never creating these or slowing code-paths where
the XFastParser is being used and tokenizing correctly
and really needs to be fast.
I fear that b) is not met by the previous patch.
Thoughts ? =)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks at collabora.com <><, GM Collabora Productivity
Skype: mmeeks, Google Hangout: mejmeeks at gmail.com
(M) +44 7795 666 147 - timezone usually UK / Europe
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list