Moving away from tools module
erack at redhat.com
Fri Apr 28 09:07:17 UTC 2017
On Friday, 2017-04-28 08:36:19 +1000, Chris Sherlock wrote:
> - time.hxx, date.hxx, datetime.hxx and datetimeutils.hxx - these all seem to be better suited to the SAL, and actually should we consider moving to chrono?
chrono is not a replacement as it doesn't offer the functionality of
tools::Date and DateTime, only for Time.
I don't care in which module the source code lives or what implements
it, but I definitely want to keep the existing functionality.
Problem with moving anything to sal is that we then guarantee stable API
and even ABI to some degree as sal is part of the SDK, or have LibO only
interfaces like with OUString.
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A
Care about Free Software, support the FSFE https://fsfe.org/support/?erack
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the LibreOffice