is it wise to comment on Bug 115625

[Muhammet Kara]

Hi krishna,

Since you have already tested for the bug on a different platform 
(Android), I don't see any harm on adding your findings to the report.

Cheers,
Muhammet

On 02/17/2018 10:06 AM, krishna wrote:
> downloaded test file and screenshots on Bug 115625 using lo viewer master daily build
>
> observation: the issue is repro on
>
> tinderbox: buildname: Android-ARM at 24-Bytemark-Hosting
> tinderbox: tree: MASTER
> tinderbox: pull time 2018-02-17 00:05:19
> tinderbox: git sha1s
> core:05986e7f98ea1c0bd8092500968774ef3f6bcef4
>
> lyf flame 3, android 5.1
>
> my dilemma:
>
> [ 1 ] issue author has expressed concern and set earlier version to 3.6,  i assumed it might be inherited from openoffice.
>
> so, dont add comment
>
> [ 2 ] add a comment stating it is repro on lo viewer master daily build.
>
> out of the above two, which one should i choose ?
> your suggestions or advice are welcome.
>
> regards,
> krishna [ kr1shna ]
> --
>
> krishna [ never ever ask about my real name or identity ]
>
> ji-bu-rish: https://github.com/kr1shna-opensource/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20180219/8bf47458/attachment.html>