is it wise to comment on Bug 115625
muhammet.kara at pardus.org.tr
Mon Feb 19 06:33:34 UTC 2018
Since you have already tested for the bug on a different platform
(Android), I don't see any harm on adding your findings to the report.
On 02/17/2018 10:06 AM, krishna wrote:
> downloaded test file and screenshots on Bug 115625 using lo viewer master daily build
> observation: the issue is repro on
> tinderbox: buildname: Android-ARM at 24-Bytemark-Hosting
> tinderbox: tree: MASTER
> tinderbox: pull time 2018-02-17 00:05:19
> tinderbox: git sha1s
> lyf flame 3, android 5.1
> my dilemma:
> [ 1 ] issue author has expressed concern and set earlier version to 3.6, i assumed it might be inherited from openoffice.
> so, dont add comment
> [ 2 ] add a comment stating it is repro on lo viewer master daily build.
> out of the above two, which one should i choose ?
> your suggestions or advice are welcome.
> krishna [ kr1shna ]
> krishna [ never ever ask about my real name or identity ]
> ji-bu-rish: https://github.com/kr1shna-opensource/
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the LibreOffice