Upstream clang compiler plugins, licensing

[Tamás Zolnai]

Hi All,

Thanks for the feedback and ideas. It might be a good idea to discuss this
on ESC and make decision how to relicense the compilerplugins code (if
relicense at all) and also how to avoid to get different licensed files
under compilerplugins folder later.
For now I'm OK with asking the authors for relicensing specific plugins
before writing an upstream check based on that.

Thanks,
Tamás

Luboš Luňák <l.lunak at collabora.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 15., H,
10:52):

> On Wednesday 10 of October 2018, Kaganski Mike wrote:
> > On 10/10/2018 10:53 PM, Tamás Zolnai wrote:
> > > With this new information I agree that it would be the best to clear
> the
> > > licensing and use LLVM in every source file under compilerplugins
> > > folder. So the question is what is the best way to do that. What is the
> > > best way to ask every authors for a permission to relicense the code?
> Do
> > > we need some kind of short license statement from the authors, similar
> > > the general LO license statement?
>
>
>  I don't know, I'm not a lawyer or even close.
>
> > I am not sure that having a subdirectory under core which is licensed
> > differently from the rest of the code is good. I imagine a situation
> > when one would need a license statement like
> >
> >    "All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be
> >     licensed under the MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license.
> >
> >     All my contributions to directory foo may be licensed under the bar
> >     license.
> >
> >     All my contributions to directory bar may be licensed ..."
> >
> > which would become a nightmare. I suppose that if a separate-licensed
> > thing is required, then just create a dedicated project, which would be
> > external dependency for LibreOffice. Of course, you'd need to get the
> > license statements for the existing code (as you discussed).
>
>
>  We already have that, don't we? There are a number of patches under
> external/
> and at least some of those shouldn't be MPLv2/LGPLv3+ licensed.
>
>  And do we even need a generic statement in these cases? How many LO
> developers would ever create code for compilerplugins/ or external/ ?
>
> --
>  Luboš Luňák
>  l.lunak at collabora.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20181015/bb6a6034/attachment.html>