Upstream clang compiler plugins, licensing

Stephan Bergmann sbergman at redhat.com
Tue Oct 23 10:08:48 UTC 2018


On 07/10/2018 19:36, Tamás Zolnai wrote:
> As I see LO's license is not compatible with LLVM license [1], as LLVM 
> license is a more permissive license which allows to make the code part 
> of a proprietary software for example. So I just wonder what is the best 
> way to integrate things to clang from LO, either as a compiler plugin or 
> a static analyzer check.
[...]
> [1] https://opensource.org/licenses/NCSA

note that llvm itself is in the process of updating its license, 
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126991.html> 
"[llvm-dev] LLVM Relicensing Update"


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list