Upstream clang compiler plugins, licensing
Stephan Bergmann
sbergman at redhat.com
Tue Oct 23 10:08:48 UTC 2018
On 07/10/2018 19:36, Tamás Zolnai wrote:
> As I see LO's license is not compatible with LLVM license [1], as LLVM
> license is a more permissive license which allows to make the code part
> of a proprietary software for example. So I just wonder what is the best
> way to integrate things to clang from LO, either as a compiler plugin or
> a static analyzer check.
[...]
> [1] https://opensource.org/licenses/NCSA
note that llvm itself is in the process of updating its license,
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126991.html>
"[llvm-dev] LLVM Relicensing Update"
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list