On backporting fix for tdf#124503 "LibreOffice doesn't detect JVM because of unexpected java.vendor property value"

rene.engelhard at mailbox.org rene.engelhard at mailbox.org
Fri Apr 12 10:40:24 UTC 2019

Am 12. April 2019 09:43:01 MESZ schrieb Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com>:
>On 11/04/2019 10:35, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> On 11/04/2019 09:30, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>>> I'd prefer a backport to both maintained branches - at the current
>>> speed of new binary Java distros springing up (and the overall
>>> trajectory of that ecosystem there), I'd expect more of those issues
>>> down the road.
>> Fair enough.  Gerrit changes up for review at 
>> <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/70587/> for libreoffice-6-1 and
>> <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/70586/> for libreoffice-6-2.
>(BTW, I only tested my fix against stock OpenJDK reporting the Oracle 
>vendor string, by manually removing that vendor information from my 
>local LO sources temporarily.  It would be great if somebody could 
>actually test it against one of those problematic OpenJDK variants that
>are unknown in the LO sources.)
>LibreOffice mailing list
>LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org


Did that last night with the libreoffice-6-1 branch including the backport.

Seems to work. At least no test failure :)


Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list