We'd like to continue the production of the 32-bit deb packages

[Eike Rathke]

Hi dreamnext,

On Thursday, 2019-08-08 10:36:17 -0500, dreamnext at gmail.com wrote:

> Thanks for you help. the 'make build-nocheck' did  the trick of passing the
> unit test, and it finishes successfully :-)
> 
> Now I'm on the stage of trying to build distributable deb files.

Which isn't recommendable though.. or rather ill-advised. Building
without checks and distributing means it may (and probably will) fail
for the end user when installed. Checks are there for a reason. make
build-nocheck does not pass the tests, it skips them. Actually
build-nocheck should never be recommended unless someone wants to do
private builds to investigate failures or do modifications and at the
end would run a build with checks again.

  Eike

-- 
GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20190808/55ab63df/attachment.sig>