Any clue if this could be a typo?
sbergman at redhat.com
Wed Jan 30 21:31:58 UTC 2019
On 30/01/2019 22:02, Matteo Casalin wrote:
> Dear all,
> I stumbled upon this code:
> and think that at line 152 token #2 should be obtained instead of token
> #1 (which was just obtained a couple of lines before).
> I don't know what this code is used for, does anybody have a clue on
> whether this is a typo or not?
That code got added with
"#100756# recording of fields re-implemented", so Oliver might still know.
More information about the LibreOffice